Sustaining Power — Metro Fiber

August 12, 2008

It’s about one hour before the tw telecom analyst call, and I can’t wait. Larissa Herda (tw telecom CEO) and friends have hit a home run at a time others are pointing at the “soft” economy as an excuse for not performing. tw telecom’s results and especially margin growth are consistent with owning and operating from your own local fiber optic platform.

If you have read this blog before, I openly admit I am a metropolitan fiber optic bigot. No shame in that. I came out of the telephone closet on this years ago.

tw telecom has done what few of us had set out to do. They have executed a long term strategy to sustain their business. That strategy, pooped on quite often by Wall Street over the years, was to build, own and operate their own metropolitan fiber optic infrastructure. And much to holding steady to this strategy, the proverbial rooster is coming home to roost while others not fiber-fortunate get squeezed by falling prices, Ma Bell renting costs and copper capacity being outstripped by physics for optical connectivity demand applications.

Besides the control you get over your costs and the unlimited bandwidth of optical access which are apparent in tw telecom’s results, you also get a certain level of regulatory immunity. This is true because the fiber is a by-pass mechanism of Ma Bell’s copper loops and special access end of life legacy network — pieces that others think they must buy!

(Sometime I will write about why I think Ma Bell’s pieces and parts are like having a drug addiction with said addiction locked in by the sole supplier.)

What most of us don’t understand, which gives tw telecom and others likely situated an even greater advantage, is that without a fiber platform you will always be disadvantaged. Customers churn when things don’t work. Customers churn when their experience sucks. Customers churn when inadequate bandwidth is available for a content rich experience (i.e., applications).

Contrary to telecom culture, customers don’t wake up in the morning telecom centric and believe that their life revolves around their provider of connectivity. Yes, as hard as it may be to believe, all the customer wants and needs is a robust, reliable rich experience. They really don’t care about our telecom acronyms either!

Being the metropolitan fiber network bigot that I am, today it’s not about the applications. In the near term, perhaps the next five years, it will be about bandwidth growth outstripping copper, bandwidth reliability and a bandwidth-based robust user experience. In my simple mind, you can have all the gee-whiz applications you want, but if they are not “bandwidth experience” supported and reliable, you might as well as sell pong as an application. (Pong – a primitive TV ping pong game back in the 1970’s which required minimal bandwidth but at its time was the best user experience).

I believe the tw telecom results and some recent inklings from Level 3 are reflecting the beginning a fundamental separation point based on demand from those that rent pieces and parts calling copper a “broadband network” from those that actually can deliver bandwidth over an owner operated local fiber optic facility.

With 90%++ office buildings still being served by one provider – Ma Bell – the bandwidth connectivity upside remains significant. However, such enormous opportunity can only be addressed by a card carrying, network owning, metropolitan fiber optic bigot(s). Don’t put applications ahead of the cart; it’s all about local fiber network location, location, connectivity…

tw telecom’s phenomenal results are solid indications that a new era of bandwidth intensity is just beginning. Those having a tummy ache over the economy … get a dose of fiber in your system and see what happens.

Remember – a clear conscience is the softest pillow.

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Once Again, Deja-Vu…

No Comments

March 19, 2010

It’s Déjà-vu all over again! Welcome back to the 1990’s–but this time with a twist!
Yes, I have been preaching the virtues of owning your own local fiber optic network and/or carriers to be on anyone elses’ network except the ILEC’s … well; the crows are coming home to roost. I’m just a simple [...]

Vindicated Again

No Comments

March 9, 2010

I continue to see and read filings with the FCC that propose to keep copper loops alive and make the ILECs cheaply share their fiber—all in an effort to influence future Broadband policy. I have yet to read a filing where the overarching theme is, “What do we need to do for America first?” [...]

Google Hysteria (Part II)

No Comments

March 4, 2010

So why is Google pretending to be interested in FTTH? Plain and simple—they are going to create data, measure and develop applications so they become an authority and advisor to the government on cyber architecture, applications, security, benefits and open access initiatives (that will ultimately become part of FCC policy). I predict that [...]

Google Hysteria (Part I)

No Comments

March 2, 2010

Those crazy guys at Google! You have to love them and their fun antics (that keep me entertained). Google begins with the letter “G” just like the government. We have Government General Motors, Government General Electric (who has been behind the scenes sucking up healthcare money with an eye on future nuclear plant [...]

Trends

No Comments

February 24, 2010

Let me begin by stating this post is a relatively short one. We are halfway through Telecom earnings reporting and I wanted to share a few underlying themes or trends I have heard and identified:
1. Top line growth is struggling, and in some cases, moving backwards except for metro fiber owners. There is lots of [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part IV)

5 comments

February 22, 2010

Without further ado, I will now unveil the Consolidation Theory. Again, I must give the disclaimer that this theory is not necessarily my own but one I have heard many times.
If certain companies elect to run a process or auction, expect the Private Equity sector to outbid the strategic buyers for the companies and [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part III)

No Comments

February 19, 2010

A recent change that has been helpful to IBs and PE firms has been the emergence of AboveNet trading in the stock market. AboveNet is a pure play, data IP fiber-optic infrastructure company that is very similar in profile to many of the healthy companies who are alleged targets for consolidation in 2010. [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part II)

1 Comment

February 18, 2010

If this round of consolidation occurs, with the last round’s trend of quantity over quality, the remaining companies are healthy and growing quite well (often at double digits). When these companies are approached, the message is simple, “We are healthy, outperforming most public companies organically and have no compelling need to sell unless the right [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part I)

No Comments

February 17, 2010

Today I plan to elaborate on the Metro Connect Conference 2010–the general discussion, meetings and buzz regarding metropolitan fiber infrastructure company consolidation. With my long history in attending and speaking at Metro Connect events over the years, I noticed there were many more investment bankers (IB) and private equity (PE) firms in attendance than [...]

Question from Reader: 2/10/10

1 Comment

February 15, 2010

Dave: Do you think that LVLT (Level 3) will ever prosper due to the growth in the use of fiber. Will ownership of the “pipe” put them in a position to increase prices and gain leverage over customers? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. Richard
Dear Richard:
Thank you for reading and especially for asking [...]

"));