Two Cents on Paetec

August 28, 2008

I got an email from a reader that said, “I’m surprised I haven’t seen the Straight Shooter’s $0.02 on this topic: Who will buy McLeod’s fiber from Paetec?

Here’s my take: What I heard on the conference call is that PAETEC is not selling fiber anymore, so analysts should not rely on said sales going forward.

I think it’s a smart move not enabling competitors.  That said, previous management to Paetec, attempting to avoid bankruptcy, sold fiber on the cheap thus enabling low cost competitors on the same local fiber routes.  I don’t believe Arunas was saying that they will divest and be a non-fiber participant.  If this were the case, in my opinion, Paetec would not have bought McLeod.  I believe Paetec management understands that fiber enables greater margin control/growth and service differentiation.

Paetec hit a bump in the road; they should be running to local fiber, not from it, regardless of the 90-day Wall Street view of matters.  Local fiber creates a sustainable, competitive advantage.

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

3 Responses to “Two Cents on Paetec”

  1. Brian Scully on August 28th, 2008 1:55 pm

    Dave,

    You are right on point with your remarks regarding Paetec.

    I will tell you, the McLeodUSA fiber is not for sale.

    Arunas knows his business is dead without it.

  2. Peter Radizeski on August 29th, 2008 11:32 am

    Two points: Running a public low-priced T1 CLEC is way different today than in the heyday of private Paetec. (I think Arunas is in over his head; hence the willy-nilly purchases of Allworx and McLeod).

    Do you need fiber? It certainly helps. But it isn’t the same model as a T1 CLEC. And Dave, AFS, has a model that no one else has/follows. Most fiber in the ground is in the same route, conduit or sheath as the next guy (e.g., L3 and XO). So router diversity?

    As I have seen recently trying to win a deal with a newly merged player, most fiber players give it away. Waves now cost the same as OC3 PL on some routes. This is not the way back to profitability for the industry … but then neither is Forbearance.

    Dave, I will give you that maybe the TA96 wasn’t worded right (but then what law is?). It was a major compromise. But the FCC has not exactly helped either. Over stepping bounds. Not looking out for the consumer. I’m not sure anyone in DC has a dictionary or a real handle on language.

    If there is going to be a sunset, it needs to be 3-5 years out and set in stone like the DTV transition. But even then, I don’t see billions in fiber being invested. We’ll just have the same as now and maybe 2 more players. Wall Street doesn’t think that Verizon FiOS will have real ROI. And neither do I if you use real numbers and not some Enron-esque accounting.

    One thing you don’t see is that in many cases Wholesale pricing from the ILEC’s is the same or higher than Retail.

  3. In the Long Run, Optical Will Matter : Telecom Straight Shooter | Telecommunication Industry News Blog on August 29th, 2008 3:43 pm

    […] We welcome commentary and discussion on issues, and the following post is in response to a comment received on my two cents on PAETEC. […]

Got something to say?





A New Year…

January 6, 2009

With the New Year upon us, bringing it’s wintry cold and the blankets of snow
– for all you global warming enthusiasts – most of us turn to thoughts of the past
Holidays.  Whether our joys stem from the religious, commercial or year-ending
celebrations, many of us reflect on the year past with thoughts of appreciation.  Most
commonly, we […]

More Video, Voice Peering Forum, Part 2

January 2, 2009

This is the second half of the interview with TMC’s Rich Tehrani.

Voice Peering Forum Interview 1 of 2

December 30, 2008

Over the summer, I participated in an interview with Rich Tehrani, president of TMC, at the Voice Peering Forum. Here is part one of the interview.

Happy holidays from all of us at AFS. We welcome your comments and questions. Post a message below or email the Straight Shooter. If you’d like, you can see more […]

Looking Ahead to ‘09, Part II

December 26, 2008

Here’s the continuation of my recent post on xchange magazine’s blog. You can see part one of this post, Looking Ahead to 2009, here.
Given the credit crisis (and my theory that the current situation will weigh on telecom well into 2010), I believe we will start to see a realization by Wall Street and those […]

Looking Ahead to 2009

December 23, 2008

Happy Holidays to you and yours. While we all take time to be with with friends and family, I thought you would enjoy a look into what is in store for CLECs in ‘09. This is an excerpt of my regular series on xchange magazine’s blog.
There’s a question that keeps coming across my email lately, […]

Open Source Solution to Amway TEM?

December 19, 2008

I recently received an email question about the skepticism and resistance to Telecom Expense Management (TEM) services, especially software solutions.  A reader wrote:
I’m writing to get your input on why TEM (Telecom Expense Management) companies seem, to me any way, to have sort of a “Multi-Level Marketing” feel to them.  The reason I ask is […]

It all comes down to parenting

December 17, 2008

I just finished reading the US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) release in fining Siemens AG $1.5 billion for a string of briberies of government officials totaling $1.1 billion. (Read the press release here.)  The release said that Siemens was caught  “engaging in a systematic practice of paying bribes to foreign government officials to obtain […]

Gomer Pyle: Part Deux

December 15, 2008

Page A18 of the December 11th issue of the Wall Street Journal, The headline read: “Political Favors at the FCC.”  Sub heading: “Kevin Martin orders up another rigged spectrum auction.”
Surprise, surprise, surprise … yet another game of Beltway insiders and money-people playing do as I say, not as I do.  We have a two tier […]

For the record

December 12, 2008

If you haven’t read or at least skimmed the House report, DECEPTION AND DISTRACTION: THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION UNDER CHAIRMAN KEVIN J. MARTIN, I encourage you to do so. On Wednesday I wrote in the blog post “Hate to say ‘I told you so’” that non-ILECs should stick to focusing time and money on infrastructure.
For […]

Hate to say “I told you so”

December 10, 2008

As Gomer Pyle would say: “Surprise, surprise, surprise …â€
For years at telecom conferences and most recently on this blog, I have heralded the waste of time, money and effort spent on lobbying the FCC or anyone else inside the beltway.  I have referred to such expenditures on lawyers and/or lobbyists as money entering a large […]