XO, Credit Crunch & the Ultimate Backstop

September 22, 2008

Here’s another great comment I got from a reader on a recent blog post about XO:

I chuckle whenever I hear people suggest that PAET should buy XO. PAET is primarily a type 2 reseller. XO, on the other hand, has quality metro fiber assets throughout the country.

Thank you for your response, and keep the emails coming.

The challenge XO has with any M&A opportunity of strategic value may be Carl Icahn.  Mr. Icahn has a propensity to view just about anything he “invests” as a purely financial exercise.  The ability to buy strategically and execute financially should be the criteria.

With the credit crunch on, asset light companies are going to have a very difficult time demonstrating margin growth to facilitate further borrowing leverage.  The risks of ILECs raising costs to CLECs will be a great concern to surviving financial firms with much tighter lending standards.   Revenue growth will be taking a back seat to EBITDA margin growth and quality of EBITDA which, in my opinion, only local fiber-based players can demonstrate. In addition, those hard fixed assets (fiber sheaths) provide the ultimate backstop for tighter credit standards.

Just a note, in case readers didn’t see it in an earlier post, “type 2″ refers to situation where a carrier who buys a circuit wholesale from Ma Bell and then resells this circuit to an end-user.

Want to weigh in on the credit crunch, fiber assets or other topics? Shoot me an email.

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

2 Responses to “XO, Credit Crunch & the Ultimate Backstop”

  1. anonymous XO follower on September 23rd, 2008 12:36 am

    And I chuckle whenever I hear that XO “has fiber all over the place”. We have ordered 1000’s of circuits from XO, and I will tell you righ now that 90% of them are Type II from ATT or VZ. Especially DS3 or below. Even their EOTDM product is delivered via Type II RBOC loops.

  2. Parkite on September 23rd, 2008 4:22 pm

    Hi Anonymous – Sounds like you have fallen victim to an overzealous XO sales rep. One of the many weaknesses in the industry (poor quality sales reps).

    If you really have ordered 1000s of circuits in different locations around the country, the majority will be offnet (type 2). XO (or AFS for that matter) is a good fit in on-net locations, but not really a great carrier to use for a nationwide buildout. IMO, you’d be better going direct with ATT or VZ.

    And EOTDM should always be type 2 by definition since CLECs don’t deploy copper plants (only fiber). At least i am not aware of CLECs deploying copper plants.

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Once Again, Deja-Vu…

No Comments

March 19, 2010

It’s Déjà-vu all over again! Welcome back to the 1990’s–but this time with a twist!
Yes, I have been preaching the virtues of owning your own local fiber optic network and/or carriers to be on anyone elses’ network except the ILEC’s … well; the crows are coming home to roost. I’m just a simple [...]

Vindicated Again

No Comments

March 9, 2010

I continue to see and read filings with the FCC that propose to keep copper loops alive and make the ILECs cheaply share their fiber—all in an effort to influence future Broadband policy. I have yet to read a filing where the overarching theme is, “What do we need to do for America first?” [...]

Google Hysteria (Part II)

No Comments

March 4, 2010

So why is Google pretending to be interested in FTTH? Plain and simple—they are going to create data, measure and develop applications so they become an authority and advisor to the government on cyber architecture, applications, security, benefits and open access initiatives (that will ultimately become part of FCC policy). I predict that [...]

Google Hysteria (Part I)

No Comments

March 2, 2010

Those crazy guys at Google! You have to love them and their fun antics (that keep me entertained). Google begins with the letter “G” just like the government. We have Government General Motors, Government General Electric (who has been behind the scenes sucking up healthcare money with an eye on future nuclear plant [...]

Trends

No Comments

February 24, 2010

Let me begin by stating this post is a relatively short one. We are halfway through Telecom earnings reporting and I wanted to share a few underlying themes or trends I have heard and identified:
1. Top line growth is struggling, and in some cases, moving backwards except for metro fiber owners. There is lots of [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part IV)

5 comments

February 22, 2010

Without further ado, I will now unveil the Consolidation Theory. Again, I must give the disclaimer that this theory is not necessarily my own but one I have heard many times.
If certain companies elect to run a process or auction, expect the Private Equity sector to outbid the strategic buyers for the companies and [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part III)

No Comments

February 19, 2010

A recent change that has been helpful to IBs and PE firms has been the emergence of AboveNet trading in the stock market. AboveNet is a pure play, data IP fiber-optic infrastructure company that is very similar in profile to many of the healthy companies who are alleged targets for consolidation in 2010. [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part II)

1 Comment

February 18, 2010

If this round of consolidation occurs, with the last round’s trend of quantity over quality, the remaining companies are healthy and growing quite well (often at double digits). When these companies are approached, the message is simple, “We are healthy, outperforming most public companies organically and have no compelling need to sell unless the right [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part I)

No Comments

February 17, 2010

Today I plan to elaborate on the Metro Connect Conference 2010–the general discussion, meetings and buzz regarding metropolitan fiber infrastructure company consolidation. With my long history in attending and speaking at Metro Connect events over the years, I noticed there were many more investment bankers (IB) and private equity (PE) firms in attendance than [...]

Question from Reader: 2/10/10

1 Comment

February 15, 2010

Dave: Do you think that LVLT (Level 3) will ever prosper due to the growth in the use of fiber. Will ownership of the “pipe” put them in a position to increase prices and gain leverage over customers? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. Richard
Dear Richard:
Thank you for reading and especially for asking [...]

"));