The Tortoise & The Hare: A Telecom Parable

October 3, 2008

Great article the other day on xchangemag.com by Kelly Teal on the current economic conditions and the impact on telecom. The piece, Recession Expected to Hit Telecom in Second Half, looks at how telcos stand to fare given the actions of Congress, peppering in perspectives from various industry analysts. This projection I found of particular note:

Ed Vilandrie, co-founder and director of business and technology consultancy Altman Vilandrie & Co., added that fiber providers, carriers with their own transport and even entities such as data centers, stand to feel less pain than other industry players. That’s because they have infrastructure that clients need, and they can help customers reduce costs by making better use of the Internet and IP. “Middlemen,” on the other hand, such as resellers without their own facilities, are likely to struggle, Vilandrie said.

Economic uncertainty?  No credit available? Economic downturn? Common sense and third party analysts alike validate the importance of owning and operating your own fiber optic infrastructure in this article.  If this thing gets as bad as the Wall Street “experts” claim (I use quotes because I don’t want to say the word I’m really thinking — “idiots”), my vision in building AFS for the long run in 1999 is coming to fruition.  It’s been a big race – the Tortoises against the Hares – with Wall Street “real smart guys” betting on the Hares since 1996.  Credit crunch, downturn … this Tortoise is seeing the finish line … the Hares, well… they’re seeing the “finished” line.

What’s your take? Shoot Dave an email or post a comment below.

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

2 Responses to “The Tortoise & The Hare: A Telecom Parable”

  1. Peter Radizeski on October 7th, 2008 12:03 am

    Fiber providers have a limited client base., which means a limited revenue capacity. You can only sell to people on your route — or more precisely in your lit buildings. You can build laterals but that will cost you big dollars.

  2. Limited revenue capacity? : Telecom Straight Shooter | Telecommunication Industry News Blog on October 7th, 2008 8:05 am

    [...] a comment from a reader on the tortoise and the hare post that said Fiber providers have a limited client base, which means a limited revenue capacity. You [...]

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Vindicated Again

No Comments

March 9, 2010

I continue to see and read filings with the FCC that propose to keep copper loops alive and make the ILECs cheaply share their fiber—all in an effort to influence future Broadband policy. I have yet to read a filing where the overarching theme is, “What do we need to do for America first?” [...]

Google Hysteria (Part II)

No Comments

March 4, 2010

So why is Google pretending to be interested in FTTH? Plain and simple—they are going to create data, measure and develop applications so they become an authority and advisor to the government on cyber architecture, applications, security, benefits and open access initiatives (that will ultimately become part of FCC policy). I predict that [...]

Google Hysteria (Part I)

No Comments

March 2, 2010

Those crazy guys at Google! You have to love them and their fun antics (that keep me entertained). Google begins with the letter “G” just like the government. We have Government General Motors, Government General Electric (who has been behind the scenes sucking up healthcare money with an eye on future nuclear plant [...]

Trends

No Comments

February 24, 2010

Let me begin by stating this post is a relatively short one. We are halfway through Telecom earnings reporting and I wanted to share a few underlying themes or trends I have heard and identified:
1. Top line growth is struggling, and in some cases, moving backwards except for metro fiber owners. There is lots of [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part IV)

5 comments

February 22, 2010

Without further ado, I will now unveil the Consolidation Theory. Again, I must give the disclaimer that this theory is not necessarily my own but one I have heard many times.
If certain companies elect to run a process or auction, expect the Private Equity sector to outbid the strategic buyers for the companies and [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part III)

No Comments

February 19, 2010

A recent change that has been helpful to IBs and PE firms has been the emergence of AboveNet trading in the stock market. AboveNet is a pure play, data IP fiber-optic infrastructure company that is very similar in profile to many of the healthy companies who are alleged targets for consolidation in 2010. [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part II)

1 Comment

February 18, 2010

If this round of consolidation occurs, with the last round’s trend of quantity over quality, the remaining companies are healthy and growing quite well (often at double digits). When these companies are approached, the message is simple, “We are healthy, outperforming most public companies organically and have no compelling need to sell unless the right [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part I)

No Comments

February 17, 2010

Today I plan to elaborate on the Metro Connect Conference 2010–the general discussion, meetings and buzz regarding metropolitan fiber infrastructure company consolidation. With my long history in attending and speaking at Metro Connect events over the years, I noticed there were many more investment bankers (IB) and private equity (PE) firms in attendance than [...]

Question from Reader: 2/10/10

1 Comment

February 15, 2010

Dave: Do you think that LVLT (Level 3) will ever prosper due to the growth in the use of fiber. Will ownership of the “pipe” put them in a position to increase prices and gain leverage over customers? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. Richard
Dear Richard:
Thank you for reading and especially for asking [...]

Metro Connect (Part III)

No Comments

February 12, 2010

Let’s go beyond the take-or-pay prerogative. Let’s talk about demand—real demand and the timing that will trigger towers to have a need for 100s of megabits (if not gigabits) of bandwidth. I am a student of demand. I like to understand demand, demand drivers, macroeconomic underpinnings, regulatory constraints and timing of events. [...]

"));