Sorry Level 3–You’re Damned if You Do…and Damned if You Don’t…

February 17, 2009

Or: An Insider’s Guide to the Constant Bait and Switch With Wall Street.

In my past 10 years as CEO of AFS (as well as in my past lives), I have become all too familiar with the continual dance with the boys on Wall Street to obtain the best valuation for our company. It goes something like this…

We meet with The Real Smart Guys on Wall Street, who proclaim, “Well, you have a pretty good company, but it’s not worth what you think it is today. However, once you get funded your value will go up… “

Once you have your funding, you’ll hear, “Well, I guess that’s good news, but once you have gross margins above X, your value will go up…”

Hit that and you’ll hear, ”Once you have a consistent recurring revenue stream…once you are operating cash flow…once you are EBITDA positive…once your EBITDA margins out perform others…once you hit nirvana of achieiving Free Cash Flow Positive (“FCF+”) and net income positive…and so on and so on…”

It’s always the next thing that will drive value.

I bring this up because Level 3 reported results a few days ago. And The Big Wig Analysts, in their infinite wisdom, are trickling out their criticisms of Level 3.

You see, Level 3 explained that they are cutting back on capital expenditures in order to achieve a positive, sustainable free cash flow positive (“FCF+”) position. The rationale is both reasonable and fundamentally sound: by cutting their capital expenses, their cash flows will increase.

This is something our friends on Wall Street have been asking of Level 3 for years—Focus on Free Cash Flow Positive, baby.

So everyone is happy right? Wrong.

Instead, Level 3 heard catcalls from the very same folks pushing them to focus on Free Cash Flow. Here’s the gist of their criticisms: “Hey Level 3–what are doing making an effort to achieve FCF+ by cutting capital expense? This is just going to slow your top line growth and end up squandering the long term advantage you’ve reaped by always investing in capital!”

I am not making this up.

The truth is, if you are a real Telecommunications company with hard assets, it is capital that drives nice margins, market sustainability, and competitive advantage. Capital has been the growth differentiator in telecom since the beginning of time.

So what is Level 3 to do? Focus on Achieving Free Cash Flow in this economy or focus on sustaining their long term advantage by maintaining leaving Cap Ex alone?

Well according to Wall Street, both are wrong answers.
Sorry, Level 3, It appears you are Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

I’ll have more to say on this in my next post….

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

4 Responses to “Sorry Level 3–You’re Damned if You Do…and Damned if You Don’t…”

  1. Herbert Luria on February 18th, 2009 5:25 pm

    Mr. Rusin is of course right in everything he says here. But when will the market reward Level3?

  2. John Harris on February 18th, 2009 7:47 pm

    Impossible to reward a company not sustainable in the long term. Stockmarket is overall a measurement of confidence. And L3 has lost all confidence from the Wise Men after so many years of promising the moon. That’s why independetely of what L3 does, they are punished. Well, the real punish people are those that bought L3 shares at 3-6-9 $. The CEO must sell the company quickly before it goes really bad. You cannot compete in the wholesale telco market without investment.

  3. Morty Dick on February 18th, 2009 11:45 pm

    Wall Street’s 250 mil sh short position in LVLT has dropped to 150 mil over the last 3 or 4 mo . As soon as that short position is gone, the Wall St ***agenda*** is gone . The brokerage houses,analysts,mkt makers & financial press , will suddenly see the light .
    The overblown complaints about substantial debt will subside . This is a ***CAPITAL INTENSIVE INDUSTRY*** & debt is a virtual necessity . The key is the ability to service that debt & as LVLT is about to prove , they can service that debt with substantial cash to spare .
    These same naysayers will be knocking down the doors to earn investment banking fees by refinancing or raising new money for LVLT .

    Full disclosure—- i am very long LVLT & follow it on a daily basis .

    With no offense to the blogger—-LVLT has the best management in telecom—–they have proved it by coming through the telecom depression of 2001 -2004 without a restructuring . Their current financial position has never been better . They have 768 mil in the bank to pay off 700 mil over the next 2 yrs . My guess is they will be F/C/F positive about 200 mil for 09 [ Q1 will be negative due to working capital needs which reverse as the yr goes forward] .

    Morty Dick

    PS—- Mason Hawkins & Prem Watsa own about 48% of the cos stock .

  4. Lawrence on February 19th, 2009 2:00 am

    Does anyone know what are these class action law suits about? How does it affect L3?
    I do believe the market is punishing L3 unfairly. Turn around may take some time as the economy is bad. But I guess if they do what they promised (cutting capEx, increase cash flow) , they will be able to sustain through this bad economy and come out big, when economy turns around.

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Dave’s Q & A

No Comments

September 3, 2010

Question: Hi Dave, love your site. Got a question for you..
If you could pick a management team – personnel gleaned from other telecoms – Who would your picks be? CEO, COO, CTO for instance.  Who do you believe are the most dynamic and innovative of the current telecom execs?  –Thanks!!
Dave: Your question [...]

Toto, I don’t think we are in Kansas anymore …

No Comments

August 25, 2010

That famous line from the Wizard of Oz.  You know, the man behind the curtain…
So here we are in Oz. A gentleman by the name of Tom Tauke from Verizon is all over the news with the proclamation that the Wicked “Network Neutrality” Witch is dead, and that the Verizon and Google proposal on [...]

Don’t Wait–

1 Comment

August 20, 2010

Friday, August 20th marks my 27th wedding anniversary which leads me to publish this yearly message.
Two years ago, on our 25th Wedding Anniversary, my wife received notice that she had breast cancer. It’s an anniversary we will never forget. She has gone through the treatments and even to this day, a certain amount [...]

“Stop the Dancing”, Dave’s Response

5 comments

August 13, 2010

Thanks for the comments, Albert. I am not unique in my views on the tremendous assets Level 3 has accumulated, but has yet to take advantage of.
My personal philosophy, when a company is not firing on all 8-cylinders, is not to go down to the boiler room and scream at the people shoveling coal [...]

The Doctor’s Research

2 comments

August 12, 2010

Do I have a treat for everyone today!  Tell your friends!
I am a friend of Dr. Andrew Odlyzko from the University of Minnesota.  For as long as I can remember, Andrew’s focus has been on bandwidth growth, demand, capacity, etc.  For years we have exchanged thoughts, data points, predictions, Wall Street analytics, research reports and–on [...]

Net Neutrality Euro

1 Comment

August 10, 2010

Over the past few years of this blog, you may have noticed just a slight splash of sarcasm or cynicism in my remarks.
Don’t get me wrong–once upon a time, I was Mr. “The Glass is 2/3 Full.” But a co-worker of mine, “Randy” was one of the most cynical persons I have ever known. [...]

Is Congress Reading?

3 comments

August 5, 2010

I am starting to wonder if members of Congress are reading this blog.
I haven’t noticed any dark SUV’s parked outside the office or my home, but what I have been reading today is scary. Maybe I am becoming a national treasure and don’t even know it—maybe I am the next Jimmy Hoffa!
If you are [...]

Stop the Dancing, Part 2

6 comments

August 5, 2010

Click here to read Stop the Dancing, Part 1.
So what do I read? A letter dated July 21st to the FCC; Re: In the Matter of Special Access for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers WC Docket no. 05-25.
The following is an excerpt by image from the letter:
Any idea what the data rate of a [...]

Stop the Dancing, Part 1

2 comments

August 3, 2010

For those of you that follow this blog regularly, I appreciate your loyalty.
To those that are new, read some of my past postings and you’ll see my Pro-America stance when it comes to making any decisions relative to US Telecommunications networks or Telecommunications Policy.
By my own admission, I am a fiber bigot and favor less–not [...]

Shawn Olson, One Year, and Perspective

1 Comment

July 27, 2010

Perspective.
That is what I have after one year–perspective.
What you do for a living should not be want defines you as a person. If it does, or you allow it to, you are cheating yourself, your family, quality of life and humanity. You are more important and meaningful than a job. The power [...]

"));