The Cat and the Rat

June 18, 2009

Though I try to steer away from politics in general (not that I don’t have a thought or two), when former AT&T Chairman & CEO monopolist Ed Whitacre’s name pops up as the next Chairman of GM, I have to say something.

This whole car thing…Ed’s appointment, including the Car Czar Rattner, is getting more and more bizarre.

Let’s start with America first, a habit I have of doing.  We have an unenjoyment (unemployment) rate over 9%.  Amongst the 9% of people not working in America, who want to work, we can’t find anyone else for these positions except Whitacre and Rattner.

Ed Whitacre was not nominated by the GM Management Committee.  Ed Whitacre is not being voted upon by the shareholders.  Ed Whitacre was appointed Chairman post-BK (chosen) by the Treasury Department!  The same Treasury Department headed up by a guy named Geitner, an ex-Goldman Sachs hash slinger.  The same Geitner socializing, I mean nationalizing, our banks to “save” them. Think TARP with strings attached and changing the rules, stress tests and other gimmicks.

President Obama just appointed his 16th Czar who is accountable to no one.  This is the Salary Czar.

Wouldn’t you think that a Salary Czar might be against hiring Whitacre on?  After all, Mr. Whitacre is living off of a $158 million AT&T pension … just like most other AT&T retirees.

Sure I know, he and other government-picked–I mean, independent–Board Directors will work for a dollar a year until things get better at GM.  However, Ed Whitacre openly admits he knows nothing about the auto industry and has no experience manufacturing anything.  So, at a dollar a year, I guess you get what you pay for.  Even unenjoyment pays more than a dollar a year.

(Please don’t tell me how a Chairman is focused on strategy because you would be wrong — a Chairman’s primary duty, I think it is called a Fiduciary Duty, is to make sure all shareholder interests are represented at the table … emphasis on the word “all.”  Many companies have separated the Chairman’s role from the CEO’s role for this exact reason – CEO focuses on strategy and execution; Chairman focuses on shareholder interests.)

Are we sure there is no other choice in the 9% unemployed that could use this job?  A $158 million pension package … how does Ed get by?  Really sorry to see a guy leave retirement to make ends meet. But social security being the mess it is in, can you blame him?

Now the Car Czar, Steve Rattner.  Stevie has a reported net worth of at least $188 million, some say over $600 million.  He is also building a small $18 million cottage on Martha’s Vineyard.  Like our buddy Ed, I just don’t know how he makes ends meet.

In his role as Car Czar he is not accountable to anyone in terms of our Constitution–not even Ed.  But if recent history is any indication of the future – if Ed and the Car Czar disagree — bye-bye Eddie!

Our Car Czar does have some history in the auto industry.  In the recent past he invested into Cerberus Holdings.  Yes– the Cerberus Holdings that took Chrysler private.  Yes–the Chrysler with TARP money, who is now owned by Fiat; and well, let’s say Cerberus did not do quite well in the deal.  Steven also owns $1000.00 in Ford Motor Company stock in a family trust. Seems qualified to me.

But Rattner’s specialty is really deal making and knowing how to invest in really good things! Yet another Real Smart Guy from Wall Street at the helm!  I am not quite sure but Stevie may have been involved in some of those credit default swap things that are way too sophisticated for people like you and I to understand.  I wonder how Stevie made out with his packaged paper?

Ed and Stevie probably crossed paths years ago.  As Ed was putting Humpty-Dumpty  (Ma Bell, aka: the ILECs) back together again by acquisitions which the government turned a blind-eye upon, I am fairly confident an investment banking firm that Mr. Rattner was with may have been involved in a few of those transactions … for a fee of course and independent judgment.

My point:  we should all feel good that Ed and Stevie share common history – the formation of a team nucleus for the new GM.

What about GM in all this?  Let’s see…  Senior secured bondholders were trashed (forget about contracts and that pesky Constitution).  Junior, unsecured debt became senior when converted into shares.  We have a monopolist as Chairman while the government under its Car Czar owns 62% of the new GM.

I really don’t see a happy ending to this story.  Do you?

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Dave’s Q & A

No Comments

September 3, 2010

Question: Hi Dave, love your site. Got a question for you..
If you could pick a management team – personnel gleaned from other telecoms – Who would your picks be? CEO, COO, CTO for instance.  Who do you believe are the most dynamic and innovative of the current telecom execs?  –Thanks!!
Dave: Your question [...]

Toto, I don’t think we are in Kansas anymore …

No Comments

August 25, 2010

That famous line from the Wizard of Oz.  You know, the man behind the curtain…
So here we are in Oz. A gentleman by the name of Tom Tauke from Verizon is all over the news with the proclamation that the Wicked “Network Neutrality” Witch is dead, and that the Verizon and Google proposal on [...]

Don’t Wait–

1 Comment

August 20, 2010

Friday, August 20th marks my 27th wedding anniversary which leads me to publish this yearly message.
Two years ago, on our 25th Wedding Anniversary, my wife received notice that she had breast cancer. It’s an anniversary we will never forget. She has gone through the treatments and even to this day, a certain amount [...]

“Stop the Dancing”, Dave’s Response

5 comments

August 13, 2010

Thanks for the comments, Albert. I am not unique in my views on the tremendous assets Level 3 has accumulated, but has yet to take advantage of.
My personal philosophy, when a company is not firing on all 8-cylinders, is not to go down to the boiler room and scream at the people shoveling coal [...]

The Doctor’s Research

2 comments

August 12, 2010

Do I have a treat for everyone today!  Tell your friends!
I am a friend of Dr. Andrew Odlyzko from the University of Minnesota.  For as long as I can remember, Andrew’s focus has been on bandwidth growth, demand, capacity, etc.  For years we have exchanged thoughts, data points, predictions, Wall Street analytics, research reports and–on [...]

Net Neutrality Euro

1 Comment

August 10, 2010

Over the past few years of this blog, you may have noticed just a slight splash of sarcasm or cynicism in my remarks.
Don’t get me wrong–once upon a time, I was Mr. “The Glass is 2/3 Full.” But a co-worker of mine, “Randy” was one of the most cynical persons I have ever known. [...]

Is Congress Reading?

3 comments

August 5, 2010

I am starting to wonder if members of Congress are reading this blog.
I haven’t noticed any dark SUV’s parked outside the office or my home, but what I have been reading today is scary. Maybe I am becoming a national treasure and don’t even know it—maybe I am the next Jimmy Hoffa!
If you are [...]

Stop the Dancing, Part 2

6 comments

August 5, 2010

Click here to read Stop the Dancing, Part 1.
So what do I read? A letter dated July 21st to the FCC; Re: In the Matter of Special Access for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers WC Docket no. 05-25.
The following is an excerpt by image from the letter:
Any idea what the data rate of a [...]

Stop the Dancing, Part 1

2 comments

August 3, 2010

For those of you that follow this blog regularly, I appreciate your loyalty.
To those that are new, read some of my past postings and you’ll see my Pro-America stance when it comes to making any decisions relative to US Telecommunications networks or Telecommunications Policy.
By my own admission, I am a fiber bigot and favor less–not [...]

Shawn Olson, One Year, and Perspective

1 Comment

July 27, 2010

Perspective.
That is what I have after one year–perspective.
What you do for a living should not be want defines you as a person. If it does, or you allow it to, you are cheating yourself, your family, quality of life and humanity. You are more important and meaningful than a job. The power [...]

"));