Speed Matters

August 27, 2009

The Communications Workers of America (CWA) have just released a study called “Speed Matters” – I couldn’t agree more that speed matters, but I also disagree with the namby-pamby view of what the CWA believes broadband speed should be.  The website for more information is www.speedmatters.org.

Before I go on to explain why the CWA recommending that an acceptable broadband speed is 10 megabits downstream and 1 megabit upstream is not in their long term best interests.  But before I go there … a trip down memory lane.

While President of Frontier Communications back in the 1990’s, I had the opportunity to interface with Local CWA 1170 – “Up the Rebel!”  Anyhow, for the most part, I had good dealings with these folks.  On occasion, I would spend a day with one of the techs in the service van’s going around fixing customers problems.  I always thought those moving office van jobs were the best in the company.  You showed up early, received your assignments, and management was now in your rear view mirror.

Customers always enjoyed when you showed up because you were there to solve a problem or initiate a service.  These grassroots services people were invaluable to the company, they knew where the proverbial bear would crap in the woods and were  street warriors, of sorts.  The biggest gripe the van nomads had was with arbitrary job assignments by management – which I happened to agree with the CWA.  A van nomad would get his or her assignments for a day and by going down the list they could tell you out of six jobs, two will take all day – if anyone new, they would.  But, management measured on how many jobs got done without considering complexity as many calls were repeat situations.

A lot of repeat situations were the result of not being allowed to do the job right in the first place in order to meet measures.  So, you completed your 6 jobs, but you know at least two will be showing up again in a day or two — no one was measuring repeats outside of the nomads in the vans.  The groans in the garages at 6:30 am when certain addresses would pop up … again and again.

This is a family blog, but some of the stories I could tell you that the van nomads experience are varied and wide — ranging from a topless women greeting a tech at the door to allowing hookers during February cold spells in Rochester to warm up for a while in the van (sorry, no hanky panky), to discovering service fraud by cross wiring blocks to the President (yours truly), riding shot gun with a super soaker pulling up on another working nomad crew and letting them have it on a hot summers day.

Anyhow, as I said I had a good relationship with the CWA and in leading the first local market competitive carrier in the United States back in 1994, the CWA was a great conduit for being competitive.  Bob Flavin, President of 1170 back then would call me occasionally and whisper sweet nothings in my ear over the phone on certain competitor’s activities or a forthcoming pissed-off customer.  Many times I was able to counter or diffuse certain situations as a result.

Bob and I didn’t need a contract to know what was in the best interest of the company and its customers – we trusted each other.

Back to the speed question.  If you look at the release of information, here are the top and bottom rankings by state in America:

Fastest Internet Connections
Delaware (9.9 mbps)
Rhode Island (9.8 mbps)
New Jersey (8.9 mbps)
Massachusetts (8.6 mbps)
New York (8.4 mbps)
Slowest Internet Connections
Mississippi (3.7 mbps)
South Carolina (3.6 mbps)
Arkansas (3.1 mbps)
Idaho (2.6 mbps)
Alaska (2.3 mbps)

No offense to Delaware or Rhode Island, but Ted Turner owns land bigger than your states.  I am surprised you don’t have higher speeds than this!

As I have advocated in previous posts that it would be in the interests of all Americans and the CWA to have a minimum threshold of 100 megabits now and 1 gigabit services to 80% of America within a decade.  My opinion, any grants or loans from the government should be predicated on achieving these parameters plus reliability standards.  When you combine speeds like this with reliability standards, the most cost effective platform is fiber optics. The 20% outside the 80% is mostly rural-rural – USF-like funded satellite, 4G or WiMax capabilities for access is my proposed solution.  Let’s face it folks, 50 megabits to rural-rural areas can be a good goal, a fair goal – dial-up or no service is unacceptable.  Global competitiveness requires we do not fall behind further by serving the lowest common denominator such as rural-rural (i.e., FTTB — Fiber-To-The-Barn) just like what has been done in our public school systems but everywhere.

Though this is my view and world statistics supports me, I have yet to get invited to the White House for lunch to discuss my opinions on 100 megabits or the dumbing down of our public education system to serve the lowest common denominator of student.

The telephone companies are on the way to becoming “integrated telemedia” (copyright Dave Rusin) companies with one huge advantage at the moment – an in place network infrastructure wire line and wireless.  However, to achieve long term cost advantage, the CWA should push for fiber connectivity while avoiding copper creep bandwidth limits to enable others to succeed.  Its pure arbitrage and a fools bet in my opinion, to milk the copper under today’s regulatory environment.  If you can’t get forbearance on the copper, either sell the copper to an unsuspecting third party or rip it out and replace it with fiber as soon as possible.  Think about it, if some CLECs whine inside the beltway for copper access, see how fast they will line up to buy the frame and copper loops from the ILEC and its regulatory conditions – I think the hypocrisy will show itself.  Let the CLEC own the facility and the van rolls … .  If you don’t believe me, go ask an RLEC … I am sure they would rather pay regulated rates for copper facility use to a CLEC that thinks it’s a great money maker… van rolls are even more costly in rural areas.

Assuming Japan, South Korea, Australia, Tasmania, those crazy Portuguese and others stand still with bandwidth rates they are delivering today, at our current rate it would take America 15 years to catch-up – assuming they stand still!

I encourage the CWA to lobby for 100 megabits and reliability first, and then the dialogue on how to incent investments private and/or public can begin in earnest.  In the interim, encourage ILEC management to offer up copper loops for out right sale to CLECs fighting forbearance – just sell them as is where is and subject to regulations – hell, the ILEC can be a CLECs customer on those loops since the business model is so lucrative per the CLECs.   Meanwhile, the CWA can get busy installing last mile fiber access and advancing America.

Up the Rebel!

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Vindicated Again

No Comments

March 9, 2010

I continue to see and read filings with the FCC that propose to keep copper loops alive and make the ILECs cheaply share their fiber—all in an effort to influence future Broadband policy. I have yet to read a filing where the overarching theme is, “What do we need to do for America first?” [...]

Google Hysteria (Part II)

No Comments

March 4, 2010

So why is Google pretending to be interested in FTTH? Plain and simple—they are going to create data, measure and develop applications so they become an authority and advisor to the government on cyber architecture, applications, security, benefits and open access initiatives (that will ultimately become part of FCC policy). I predict that [...]

Google Hysteria (Part I)

No Comments

March 2, 2010

Those crazy guys at Google! You have to love them and their fun antics (that keep me entertained). Google begins with the letter “G” just like the government. We have Government General Motors, Government General Electric (who has been behind the scenes sucking up healthcare money with an eye on future nuclear plant [...]

Trends

No Comments

February 24, 2010

Let me begin by stating this post is a relatively short one. We are halfway through Telecom earnings reporting and I wanted to share a few underlying themes or trends I have heard and identified:
1. Top line growth is struggling, and in some cases, moving backwards except for metro fiber owners. There is lots of [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part IV)

5 comments

February 22, 2010

Without further ado, I will now unveil the Consolidation Theory. Again, I must give the disclaimer that this theory is not necessarily my own but one I have heard many times.
If certain companies elect to run a process or auction, expect the Private Equity sector to outbid the strategic buyers for the companies and [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part III)

No Comments

February 19, 2010

A recent change that has been helpful to IBs and PE firms has been the emergence of AboveNet trading in the stock market. AboveNet is a pure play, data IP fiber-optic infrastructure company that is very similar in profile to many of the healthy companies who are alleged targets for consolidation in 2010. [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part II)

1 Comment

February 18, 2010

If this round of consolidation occurs, with the last round’s trend of quantity over quality, the remaining companies are healthy and growing quite well (often at double digits). When these companies are approached, the message is simple, “We are healthy, outperforming most public companies organically and have no compelling need to sell unless the right [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part I)

No Comments

February 17, 2010

Today I plan to elaborate on the Metro Connect Conference 2010–the general discussion, meetings and buzz regarding metropolitan fiber infrastructure company consolidation. With my long history in attending and speaking at Metro Connect events over the years, I noticed there were many more investment bankers (IB) and private equity (PE) firms in attendance than [...]

Question from Reader: 2/10/10

1 Comment

February 15, 2010

Dave: Do you think that LVLT (Level 3) will ever prosper due to the growth in the use of fiber. Will ownership of the “pipe” put them in a position to increase prices and gain leverage over customers? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. Richard
Dear Richard:
Thank you for reading and especially for asking [...]

Metro Connect (Part III)

No Comments

February 12, 2010

Let’s go beyond the take-or-pay prerogative. Let’s talk about demand—real demand and the timing that will trigger towers to have a need for 100s of megabits (if not gigabits) of bandwidth. I am a student of demand. I like to understand demand, demand drivers, macroeconomic underpinnings, regulatory constraints and timing of events. [...]

"));