A Passing Thought on Public Company Valuations…

November 17, 2009

An interesting thought has occurred to me that I’d like to share with private company CEO’s and various Telecom analysts.

Why are carriers trading at mundane multiples, while data centers are trading much higher though they are codependent?

Here is my theory: I believe analysts have seen inside a number of private carrier companies, a.k.a. “the numbers,” and they are seeing those of us who survived the downturn out-performing most public companies.

If my theory holds water, it creates an interesting Catch 22 situation. Public comps are muted because private companies are bursting at the seams with growth. But a public company will not acquire a private healthy company because they limit themselves to their current EBITDA multiple, and can’t figure out how to explain paying up for a private concern to Wall Street.

Interesting conundrum isn’t it?

I do have one exception to my theory, as I believe this company represents more what many healthy private carrier companies look like. That company is AboveNet. The analysts need to start placing AboveNet in a category of its own, given what we are seeing in their results. Also very reflective of many private carrier companies.

My opinion, knowing thoroughly the AboveNet business model, is that they should be trading at least 10x -12x forward EBITDA in comparison to peer companies. An all data/IP business with no legacy, limited type 2 circuits is an efficient, growth oriented profitable business. I say get ready to get bored with AboveNet – they will be predictable in continued positive growth and results without changing a thing for at least the next three years easily. They are not weighed down by legacy infrastructure, ILEC reliance for pieces and parts and are selling a reliable platform for anyone to use – an open network! No applications with thin margins, high churn, high sales costs and high back office costs. What’s there not to like?

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

2 Responses to “A Passing Thought on Public Company Valuations…”

  1. Dhu on November 18th, 2009 5:33 am

    Maybe the fact that they had to go through a Chapter 11 to get there. I don’t want to sound too naive, but this does represent unfair competition against the few companies who didn’t make their original shareholders loose everything in a Chapter 11 proceeding

  2. Global Telecom Guy on November 25th, 2009 11:31 am

    This is something we talk about quite frequently here at Global Telecom & Technology (aka “GTT” trading under ticket symbol GTLT). Some conventional wisdom is that those who build fiber networks have so commonly over-extended themselves with debt, which causes price and margin erosion in the market, that the Street has gotten wise. On the other hand, data center builders maybe don’t have the same traumatic track record, and therefore collective valuations are greater?

    Not sure… but at the end of the day EBITDA generation is key, and in the long term, the Street will value the companies at the proper multiples of EBITDA, and ratio of operations profit to debt.

    Let’s hope that day comes soon!

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Once Again, Deja-Vu…

No Comments

March 19, 2010

It’s Déjà-vu all over again! Welcome back to the 1990’s–but this time with a twist!
Yes, I have been preaching the virtues of owning your own local fiber optic network and/or carriers to be on anyone elses’ network except the ILEC’s … well; the crows are coming home to roost. I’m just a simple [...]

Vindicated Again

No Comments

March 9, 2010

I continue to see and read filings with the FCC that propose to keep copper loops alive and make the ILECs cheaply share their fiber—all in an effort to influence future Broadband policy. I have yet to read a filing where the overarching theme is, “What do we need to do for America first?” [...]

Google Hysteria (Part II)

No Comments

March 4, 2010

So why is Google pretending to be interested in FTTH? Plain and simple—they are going to create data, measure and develop applications so they become an authority and advisor to the government on cyber architecture, applications, security, benefits and open access initiatives (that will ultimately become part of FCC policy). I predict that [...]

Google Hysteria (Part I)

No Comments

March 2, 2010

Those crazy guys at Google! You have to love them and their fun antics (that keep me entertained). Google begins with the letter “G” just like the government. We have Government General Motors, Government General Electric (who has been behind the scenes sucking up healthcare money with an eye on future nuclear plant [...]

Trends

No Comments

February 24, 2010

Let me begin by stating this post is a relatively short one. We are halfway through Telecom earnings reporting and I wanted to share a few underlying themes or trends I have heard and identified:
1. Top line growth is struggling, and in some cases, moving backwards except for metro fiber owners. There is lots of [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part IV)

5 comments

February 22, 2010

Without further ado, I will now unveil the Consolidation Theory. Again, I must give the disclaimer that this theory is not necessarily my own but one I have heard many times.
If certain companies elect to run a process or auction, expect the Private Equity sector to outbid the strategic buyers for the companies and [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part III)

No Comments

February 19, 2010

A recent change that has been helpful to IBs and PE firms has been the emergence of AboveNet trading in the stock market. AboveNet is a pure play, data IP fiber-optic infrastructure company that is very similar in profile to many of the healthy companies who are alleged targets for consolidation in 2010. [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part II)

1 Comment

February 18, 2010

If this round of consolidation occurs, with the last round’s trend of quantity over quality, the remaining companies are healthy and growing quite well (often at double digits). When these companies are approached, the message is simple, “We are healthy, outperforming most public companies organically and have no compelling need to sell unless the right [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part I)

No Comments

February 17, 2010

Today I plan to elaborate on the Metro Connect Conference 2010–the general discussion, meetings and buzz regarding metropolitan fiber infrastructure company consolidation. With my long history in attending and speaking at Metro Connect events over the years, I noticed there were many more investment bankers (IB) and private equity (PE) firms in attendance than [...]

Question from Reader: 2/10/10

1 Comment

February 15, 2010

Dave: Do you think that LVLT (Level 3) will ever prosper due to the growth in the use of fiber. Will ownership of the “pipe” put them in a position to increase prices and gain leverage over customers? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. Richard
Dear Richard:
Thank you for reading and especially for asking [...]

"));