You Just Can’t Make This Stuff Up

December 10, 2009

Remember Ed Whitacre?

He was formally the Chairman & CEO of AT&T. He retired a year or so ago after trying to put Humpty Dumpty (Ma Bell) back together again as CEO of SBC through a series of ILEC acquisitions, the last culminating in buying AT&T and changing from SBC in name to AT&T.

So, here is “Uncle Ed” with a career of monopoly management–I’m not saying that’s a negative–it just is what it is. Uncle Ed would fight through all sorts of legal maneuvering to keep AT&T/SBC from opening up their networks or new fiber optic builds to facilitate real broadband, choice, and that four letter word Uncle Ed dislikes: Competition.

To spare you the history, let’s just say that while at AT&T/SBC, Uncle Ed was not too fond of labor unions. He was especially not fond of the Communications Workers of America (CWA).

Uncle Ed was a typical ILEC CEO; he primarily remained hidden behind the brand without undue outward retail exposure or risk-taking from a marketing perspective. I ask you, “Who other than those in Telecom or certain Wall Street firms would even know Ed Whitacre if he showed up on your door step tonight?”

Not many. But stay with me…the irony of the story is developing.

To summarize, we now have a guy with penchant against government regulatory matters concerning competition and a less than cordial relationship with labor unions. A person who is relatively anonymous outside of the telecom-centric world—no one really knows much of him, his track record or opinions.

So, our hero Ed is sitting around the house one day, retired…probably watching Oprah, and the phone rings. It’s the United States government, his former arch enemy! They have a tantalizing and mind-boggling proposition—to get his assistance as the Chairman of General Motors. General Motors was clearly headed for failure but the government wouldn’t allow it to fail primarily due to its lumbering size.

Ed openly admits he knows absolutely nothing about the automobile industry but didn’t let that small fact stop him from accepting the offer. This counter-intuitive thinking makes perfect sense if you think about it in Beltway terms…with a staggering 10.2% national unemployment rate, our government could not find anyone else with experience in the automobile industry! A used car dealership owner knows more about the auto industry than Uncle Ed…

The stage is now set.

One night a few months back, I am indulging in a little late night TV with the hard-hitting interviewer Charlie Rose, or someone similar, and all of a sudden what pops up on my giant TV screen? Yep, you guessed it—Uncle Ed hawking GM cars in a retail commercial. I almost fell out of my chair. Ed’s commercial can be viewed here in case you have missed it or didn’t recognize Uncle Ed.

The man speaking with a slight Texas twang in the clip is Uncle Ed, with no auto experience, telling us to buy from General Motors. Just like at AT&T – he knows what’s good for you. In the 30 years I have been in Telecom, this commercial is the first time I have seen Uncle Ed in a broadcast environment trying to peddle his goods. Ed was usually the man behind the curtain, not out front when it came to selling or speaking with customers.

Also, did you spot something else that I found hysterical? Ed pitches that you can buy a car from GM, and within 60 days if you don’t like your purchase, you can return it without any questions asked. Now, I know he did not steal this “60 day return policy with no questions asked” from the AT&T play book. AT&T has never shown such affection towards its customers…they typically fight tooth and nail if you try to cancel service that didn’t work and lock you into a contract. I suggest you look at the fine print on this 60 day no questions asked offer…you’ll see why I almost tumbled off the couch.

But wait…it only gets better.

In short, the government (taxpayers) and the United Auto Workers union (UAW) basically own and run GM. So you have Uncle Ed working with one of the largest share owners, a union, to save GM. The irony of it all!

It may be the lack of consumer ad recall or that a multi-millionaire touting GM to a blue collar crowd doesn’t fly well but I have noticed that Uncle Ed’s commercials have not been running recently.

Something tells me that Uncle Ed’s retail stardom has come to an end. More recently, I have noticed that former NFL Oakland Raider defensive line man and 8-time Pro Bowl player Howie Long has become GM’s pitchman. Seems to me that, regardless of the channel or how quickly you are speeding through a commercial on your DVR, there is Howie…dressed up very nicely and selling automobiles.

Just a little more irony: in 1987, the NFL players union went on a 57 day strike after negotiations failed. NFL owners continued the season using non-union players and union players wishing to “cross the union line” also known as a “scab.” Howie Long is a scab because he broke from the NFL Players Union strike and reported for practice. Later that same day he recanted and flipped back so his scab-dom was extremely short-lived.

I don’t know about you but most unions don’t take to kindly to scabs, scabs of any sort, no matter how short of a time you scabbed. Howie Long is a scab.

So, I’m going to summarize the bones of the situation in one long-winded paragraph…GM is now run by a former Telecom-practicing monopolist that legally fought the government (tax payers) on a regular basis (and won), openly admitted knowing nothing about the automobile industry and gave up his couch-surfing Oprah habit because he was probably having a difficult time making ends meet on a multi-million dollar retirement pension from AT&T. The new GM Chairman is now joined at the hip with the UAW labor union as, technically speaking, his boss. The UAW, a significant shareowner in the new GM, stands idle while a former scab (that is probably getting paid gobs of money to be in commercials) seems perfectly content. I wonder if any UAW workers have lost their jobs.

All this rhetoric amounts to a hill of beans, but you have to admit, the irony of it all is exceptional.

Written by Dave Rusin - Telecom Executive
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
StumbleUpon It!

Comments

One Response to “You Just Can’t Make This Stuff Up”

  1. Teddy Solomon on December 11th, 2009 8:21 pm

    Damn good. One of your best

Got something to say?





"viagra patent expire" Viagra Sale
viagra anxiety

Once Again, Deja-Vu…

No Comments

March 19, 2010

It’s Déjà-vu all over again! Welcome back to the 1990’s–but this time with a twist!
Yes, I have been preaching the virtues of owning your own local fiber optic network and/or carriers to be on anyone elses’ network except the ILEC’s … well; the crows are coming home to roost. I’m just a simple [...]

Vindicated Again

No Comments

March 9, 2010

I continue to see and read filings with the FCC that propose to keep copper loops alive and make the ILECs cheaply share their fiber—all in an effort to influence future Broadband policy. I have yet to read a filing where the overarching theme is, “What do we need to do for America first?” [...]

Google Hysteria (Part II)

No Comments

March 4, 2010

So why is Google pretending to be interested in FTTH? Plain and simple—they are going to create data, measure and develop applications so they become an authority and advisor to the government on cyber architecture, applications, security, benefits and open access initiatives (that will ultimately become part of FCC policy). I predict that [...]

Google Hysteria (Part I)

No Comments

March 2, 2010

Those crazy guys at Google! You have to love them and their fun antics (that keep me entertained). Google begins with the letter “G” just like the government. We have Government General Motors, Government General Electric (who has been behind the scenes sucking up healthcare money with an eye on future nuclear plant [...]

Trends

No Comments

February 24, 2010

Let me begin by stating this post is a relatively short one. We are halfway through Telecom earnings reporting and I wanted to share a few underlying themes or trends I have heard and identified:
1. Top line growth is struggling, and in some cases, moving backwards except for metro fiber owners. There is lots of [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part IV)

5 comments

February 22, 2010

Without further ado, I will now unveil the Consolidation Theory. Again, I must give the disclaimer that this theory is not necessarily my own but one I have heard many times.
If certain companies elect to run a process or auction, expect the Private Equity sector to outbid the strategic buyers for the companies and [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part III)

No Comments

February 19, 2010

A recent change that has been helpful to IBs and PE firms has been the emergence of AboveNet trading in the stock market. AboveNet is a pure play, data IP fiber-optic infrastructure company that is very similar in profile to many of the healthy companies who are alleged targets for consolidation in 2010. [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part II)

1 Comment

February 18, 2010

If this round of consolidation occurs, with the last round’s trend of quantity over quality, the remaining companies are healthy and growing quite well (often at double digits). When these companies are approached, the message is simple, “We are healthy, outperforming most public companies organically and have no compelling need to sell unless the right [...]

Metro Connect Consolidation (Part I)

No Comments

February 17, 2010

Today I plan to elaborate on the Metro Connect Conference 2010–the general discussion, meetings and buzz regarding metropolitan fiber infrastructure company consolidation. With my long history in attending and speaking at Metro Connect events over the years, I noticed there were many more investment bankers (IB) and private equity (PE) firms in attendance than [...]

Question from Reader: 2/10/10

1 Comment

February 15, 2010

Dave: Do you think that LVLT (Level 3) will ever prosper due to the growth in the use of fiber. Will ownership of the “pipe” put them in a position to increase prices and gain leverage over customers? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks. Richard
Dear Richard:
Thank you for reading and especially for asking [...]

"));